Packers Push for ‘Tush Push’ Ban as Official Proposal Moves Forward

The Green Bay Packers have officially joined the push to ban the controversial “Tush Push” quarterback sneak play, commonly executed by the Philadelphia Eagles. Packers president Mark Murphy has been vocal about his stance against the play, citing concerns over fairness, competitiveness, and the lack of skill involved. Now, the NFL is set to review an official proposal to outlaw the Tush Push, a move that could significantly impact short-yardage strategies across the league.

Murphy’s Case Against the Tush Push
Murphy believes that the play, which involves offensive linemen and other players pushing the quarterback forward, has turned third-and-short and fourth-and-short situations into automatic first downs, eliminating defensive strategy. He pointed to instances in which teams, such as the Washington Commanders, resorted to jumping offsides in a desperate attempt to stop it—something he considers bad for the game.

“There is no skill involved,” Murphy stated. “It’s almost an automatic conversion for a yard or less.”

A Return to Traditional Quarterback Sneaks?
Murphy also referenced historical precedent, stating that the NFL previously had a rule prohibiting players from pushing a ball carrier forward. That rule was removed because it was difficult to enforce, but Murphy argues that bringing it back would restore the integrity of the quarterback sneak.

“The play is bad for the game, and we should go back to prohibiting the push of the runner,” Murphy said, advocating for a return to more traditional QB sneaks, like the one famously executed by Bart Starr in the Ice Bowl.

What’s Next?
With an official proposal now on the table, NFL owners will vote on whether to ban the Tush Push in the upcoming offseason meetings. The debate is likely to be heated, as teams like the Eagles have perfected the strategy, while others believe it gives an unfair advantage to offenses.

Will the NFL eliminate the Tush Push, or will it remain a part of modern football? The decision could reshape how teams approach short-yardage situations for years to come.